Clogs and Plungers

  

DCC 

“Clogs and Plungers”

  

The unhappy story of the Denver Chess Club

  

by Pete Short

  

I have played chess off and on in Colorado since 1998.  In fact, I have played in 88 Colorado Rated Tournaments in that time and 72 of those tournaments have been played on Tuesday Nights at the Denver Chess Club.  Since most of the 72 DCC Tuesday Night Tourneys lasted over the course of 4 or 5 Tuesdays in a month and recently I have not been able to play in all games, lets say that my “experience” spans over 208 Tuesdays or 4 solid years of Tuesday Nights.  To be fair, I often exaggerate and sometimes I am not so good at Math.  So whether I have spent 3 or 5 years of Tuesdays playing chess at the Denver Chess Club in its various locations, I will respectively submit, I have the bona fides to tell a few tales, spin a few yarns, and share some rather interesting observations during that time. 

In real estate, the three most important things are Location, Location, and Location.  Bobby Fischer was the first outspoken proponent that playing conditions in chess must be improved.  Since I play with headphones, and according Shannon Fox, have an apparent undiagnosed case of Tourettes Syndrome (I rock back and forth in my chair almost as much as Randy Schine and sometimes vocalize over the music with draw offers and post game analysis), my only real wish is something Ernest Hemingway titled in one of his 1926 short stories – “A clean, well lighted place” to play chess.  Let’s start there with my miniature tome on the Denver Chess Club. 

 dcclogo7oa 

On a bright note, we have yet to play in a Greyhound Bus Terminal.  Wait, most bus terminals are well lit.  The first location of the Denver Chess Club I played chess at in June 1998 was a miserable Denver Public Schools remedial education center called PS1 on Bannock Street.  My mental health advisor and longtime friend, Shannon Fox, drug me there and everything about the place was horrible.  Poor lighting, a hearing impaired tournament director (Martin Kelly) who bellowed, and the bathroom (a common theme you are about to read about) had been frequented prior to the tournament by a parade of little boys who obviously made wagers on who could drench the pipe work near the ceiling and on the floors in lieu of the porcelain.  The smell from the “boys” room was not appreciably better from the tournament area.  A win, two draws, and a loss later I took my first sabbatical from the Denver Chess Club.  In fact, the experience kept me away from any tournament chess for almost 4 years. 

A lot happened in the World between June 1998 and February 2002.  One of the apparent good things was the closure and ultimate bulldozing of PS1.  Well, like a “recovered” alcoholic who backslides, I found myself at the chess board again and that meant going to the new Denver Chess Club on Bannock Street at the VFW located, you guessed it, in the building right next to PS1.  Thus began a period of apparent harmony.  Once you looked past the haggard drunks on the smoke filled first floor that comprised of a bar and made it to the second floor, there was a large, well lighted dance hall-like playing room with nice folding tables and chairs. And more importantly, lots of windows to look out constantly to ensure your car was not being broken into.  

VFW Post 1 Bannock Ave Denver Colorado

VFW Post 1 Bannock Ave Denver

It was a Renaissance in Denver Chess with notable players in attendance like IM Mike “Boots” Valvo, Andy “Attention to Detail” Rea, Imre Barlay, James McCarty, Mikhail and Philip Ponomarev, and Brian Wall.  An entire crop of wunderkind like Tyler Hughes, Josh Suresh, Mitesh Shridhar, Amarjin “Parmesan” Nemekhbayer, Ted Doykos, Jesse “Little Fester” Hester, the Herbst brothers, and the Derbyshire clan.  The club was well managed with the diligence of club manager LaMoyne Splichal and weekend tournaments of substance were organized by DCC President JC MacNeil and his sidekick VP Paul Grimm.  Of course there were plenty of non-notable notables there as well in addition to a strong stable of class players for whom I do not have room to call out.  But as an example of the non-notable notables, I will point your attention to the Wilhite Brothers (who after every loss in which they played 1. h3 informed you that “You got lucky”) and Wayne Trapp (who ran out with the money that was given to him to create the first DCC Webpage).  

But what made it great for me was the number of my Raytheon co-workers who were normally in attendance – John D. Mitchell, Don Romano, Tim Brennan, Francisco Baltier, Robert Bechman, and Shannon Fox.  I could look past the controversy of expelling Philip Ponomarev for fighting (which ultimately led to the resignation of the entire Executive Office), the hand generated pairings, the months it took for ratings to appear on my USCF ratings page, Election Tuesdays where games did not commence until the polls closed at the VFW Precinct, and the jackass who managed the VFW who was constantly leering at the chess players from behind the bar.  

But all good things must come to an end and for the Denver Chess Club; it manifested itself with “Toilet Gate 2003”.  You got it, a clogged toilet in the VFW, attributed to a Denver Chess Club Player, and we found ourselves out on the street.  News Trucks and Reporters summoned by yours truly to put public pressure on the VFW only bought us one more Tuesday Night and then we were without a place to play.  As my great friend Tim Brennan reminded me, before we left that night I scribbled a rather unflattering note to the VFW “Jackass” Manager on a bar napkin and slid it under his office door.  My apologies to Andy Rea for having to bear his subsequent rage (Note to self: check statute of limitations in Colorado Codes). 

You might think that with the loss of the VFW, the DCC would find a better place to play chess than above a smoky bar.  No chance, thanks to the dedicated and well intended Joe Haines, we found ourselves playing chess in the “Camp Fire Girls” cabin in the woods off Sheraton.  You got it – our new home was cold in the winter and sweltering in the summer – and did I mention – only one toilet that was shared by everyone.  But even quaint cabins in the woods are short lived as a place to play chess as Joe Haines watched the non-profit he directed tank and the cabin sold off in auction.  Not only did we lose membership in our move from the VFW, but we suffered the same privations of the pioneers just to be booted off our chess site like the Native Americans lost their ancestral lands to suffer yet another indignity. 

“And an angel on high provided a holy place…”  And that place was a stuffy church basement with terrible lighting.  The kind of lighting where chess players actually played under utility lamps on stands when they could be found and one desk lamp someone actually brought with him to discern the colors of the squares.  I could recount stories of woe from our tenure at this church, but our stay was short lived and fortunately we were asked to leave despite the constant warnings by our new DCC President Joe Haines not to resort to violence during game play and not clog the toilet.  You might think I am exaggerating that prior to the pairings each week an announcement was deemed necessary for chess players not to pummel each other and practice good bathroom etiquette , after all I warned you I can spin a yarn.  Sorry, the truth often eclipses fiction as the most interesting and the most appalling.  

Not to sound redundant, we went to yet another Church and our current playing location on 1st Street.  After you negotiate a treacherously narrow set of stairs you arrive at the subterranean playing area affectionately known as the “crypt” and the “basement bomb shelter”.  I grow tired of the continuing theme, but at least since May 2009, there has been a plunger sitting in the lone urinal with a sign long ago faded into obscurity that reads – “Do Not Use” (see photo below – click to enlarge).  It’s a shame that JC was a carpenter, the DCC pays $350 per month to play there and “God’s Disciples” can’t spring for plumber.  Well, the bright side is we have not been kicked out, evicted for auction, or asked to leave.  We have to leave because membership, which once soared in the 50’s and 60’s each week, has dwindled to the low 20’s and we can’t afford the $350 per month (despite what could cost a player around $32-$40 a month to play). 

DCC Toilet

Clog and Plunger Photo taken at Denver Chess Club Dec 29, 2009

  

“Well Pete, perhaps this is finally the chance for the DCC to find a decent place to play?”, you might ask.  Perhaps that clean, well lighted place you spoke of earlier.  A place where they have abundant urinals and working toilets that are clean and perhaps they even put in those “aroma” disks to keep the smell down.  Well Sir/Ma’am, if you liken this to the International House of Pancakes, the IHOP as I like to say, you may be on to something.  Unlike “Houses of the Lord”, the IHOP has offered their community room for free with the implied hope that before or after you play you will gorge yourself on blueberry pancakes – those same blueberry pancakes that Fabienne in Pulp Fiction was not able to find while Butch retrieved his father’s watch that Captain Koons kept in the only place where the Gooks in the “Hanoi Hilton” would not find it – up his ass.  I digress.  Unless someone in Denver steps up and actually finds a University (of which there are several in Denver and where countless chess clubs across the country play), a community center (Like the Jewish Community Center that the Tucson Chess Club meets in every week), or another cabin in the woods (anyone know of a non-profit in dire straights?), we’ll all be pushing wood across syrup streaked vinyl boards at the IHOP off Colorado Blvd.

Posted in Fun | 5 Comments

Jan 2003 Colorado Chess Informant

The Jan 2003 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • My favorite Sicilian Trap by Tim Brennan
  • On 3 fold repetition and Touch Move Travesty by James Kulbacki
  • Games from the 2003 Denver Membership Open and 2002 Colorado Open
  • The Chess Detective by NM Todd Bardwick
  • Four Corners Team Tournament report by Jon Fortune
  • Colorado Chess History
  • Calculating Colorado Tour Points by Paul Grimm
  • The Sicilian Defense as seen by Opening Theorists by Jeffrey A. Baffo
  • Pop Quiz Hotshot!
  • The Incredible Tyler Hughes by LM Brian Wall
  • International Master Ernesto Sevillano Wins US Championship in Moab
  • The Denver Chess Club in 2002 Fast Facts by Paul Grimm
Posted in Colorado Chess Informant | Leave a comment

What Chess piece are you?

This is a quiz that I first saw on facebook.  I avoid most of the quizzes on there, but couldn’t resist this one.  It is only 5 questions long, so pretty painless, and fun.

http://www.blogthings.com/whatchesspieceareyouquiz/

You Are the King


You may not move quickly, but you move with purpose. You take every decision in your life seriously.

You don’t think that most risks are worth their potential downsides. You try to protect yourself at all costs.

Some people may consider you an egomaniac, but you’re simply self-interested. It’s perfectly natural to want to put yourself first.

You have a lot of responsibility, an a lot of people depend on you. If you were taken out of commission, those that depend on you would be doomed.

Posted in Fun | Leave a comment

Newsletters from Colorado Springs Chess Night

 

Here are some more back issues of Fred Spell’s excellent newsletter of the Wednesday night club that plays rated chess in Colorado Springs, CO.

Each newsletter is very nicely done, and features games from the players including regulars such as Dean Brown, Anthea Carson, Jerry Maier, Fred Spell, Gordon Randall, Mitch Anderson, James Powers, Shaun MacMillan, David Meliti, Paul Covington, Tom Mullikin, Bill Weihmiller, Joe Fromme, Larry Wutt, Alex Freeman and many others!!

If you use chessbase, you can highlight each of the games, and use “copy” and “paste” right out of the PDF document, pasting the text right into an empty board, and then play through the moves.

 

 

 

Posted in Games, Tournaments | Leave a comment

Mikhail Tal Painting

Anthea Carson made a great oil painting of Mikhail Tal that she is selling on eBay.  Check out the auction on the link below!

PIC-0527

http://shop.ebay.com/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Touch Move Rule

I was talking to my awesome chess buddy Pete Short during the November Air Force Academy Quad tournament about the Touch Move rule.  In the game between Shannon Fox and Mark McGough there was some controversy about the touch move, and Mark ended up getting 2 minutes awarded on his clock.  I don’t really know all the details, but it sounded like there were two sides to the story, as is often the case.

Pete made a comment that if the player touches 2 pieces, his opponent gets to choose which piece the person has to move.  This didn’t sound right to me, so I looked it up after the tournament.

The 5th Edition of the USCF Rulebook says:

10B Except for 10A (Adjustment of Pieces), a player on move who deliberately touches one or more pieces, in a manner that may reasonably be interpreted as the beginning of a move, must move or capture the first piece touched that can be moved or captured.

So your opponent doesn’t get to choose which piece you have to move if you touch all of the pieces on the board :-)

Now you know, and knowing is half the battle!

Posted in Rules | Leave a comment

2009 Colorado Correspondance Chess Championship results

Congrats to Jeffrey A Baffo for his first place finish in this inaugral event!

Final Standings:  

Tie-breaks  The first (and only necessary) is Sonnegorn-Berger. Sonnegorn-Berger is calculated by adding up the scores of your opponents whom you beat, and taking half of the total score of your opponents who you drew.  For example, Derek Fish, the player with the best tie-breaks with 3.5, beat Klaus (6), Archie (4.5), and Lee (3.5) for a total of 14.0, and also drew Ginny (1.5/2=0.75) for a grand total of 14 3/4.  

Interesting Stats.   White won 13 games, Black won 15 games, and 8 games were drawn. The average game took 162 days to complete.  

Deadlines coming up!  Entries are accepted for the 2009 Golden/Electronic Knights only through November 30th 2009. Any entries received after that date will be reverted to the 2010 Knights.  The entry fee is $25.   Entries will be accepted by Lee Lahti for the 2010 Colorado Correspondence Championship until December 15th 2009. Entry fee is $20 for this event.  

New Correspondence Page On colorado-chess.com website  Webmaster Rick Nelson has agreed to maintain a seperate page solely for correspondence chess on the colorado-chess.com website. Link here: http://www.colorado-chess.com/correspondence.php   The webpage has the most recent standings and information about Colorado, National, and International correspondence tournaments. It will be updated approximately once a month.

Notes about the 2010 Championship from Klaus Johnson
The 2010 championship will be played on servers instead of by email.
The entry fee for the 2010 Colorado Correspondence Championship is $20. Lee is currently accepting entries via check: Lee Lahti 2836 Sombrero Lane, Fort Collins 80525.

USCF offers some correspondence games on ICCF (International Correspondence Chess Federation)’s webserver. The games are according to USCF rules, are USCF-rated, and have nothing really to do with ICCF, however USCF does not have a large enough correspondence population to justify running an entire server, so they instead are hosted by ICCF.

So each of you will get an ICCF ID# and password, and you’ll be able to log-in to the ICCF webserver. Let me reiterate though that the 2010 Colorado Correspondence Championship is an USCF-event run by USCF-rules. You will not get an ICCF rating from this tournament.

The TLA is at http://www.colorado-chess.com/newtourn.shtml#508

 
Posted in Correspondance | Leave a comment

October 2004 Colorado Chess Informant

The October 2004 Colorado Chess Informant features:

  • Chess Psychology and Playing Styles by Ron Akin
  • 2004 Denver Open
  • Teasers versus Geezers
  • Avid is a Four Letter Word (Compares Poker to Chess) by Michael Marson
  • My game against DuWayne Langseth: An Attack Depleted Before its Time by Randy Reynolds
  • Wall-Bloomer 2004 Colorado Closed by LM Brian Wall
  • Pikes Peak Open games by Richard Buchanan
  • Colorado Springs Chess Club simul by Joe Fromme
  • My Three Close Encounters with Bobby Fischer by Vance Aandahl
  • B-Tree Database for Relative Strength of Chess Positions by Colin James III
  • Operation “Swindle Master” Quarterly Update #3
  • Interview with Renae Delaware by Life Master Brian Wall
  • International Master Michael J. Valvo passes
Posted in Colorado Chess Informant | 1 Comment

January 2004 Colorado Chess Informant

The January 2004 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • Games from the 2003 Colorado Open by Mark Scheidies
  • Shabalov continues US Chess domination at Levy Memorial
  • US Champ plays Regis Jesuit Students
  • Games from 2003 Edward Levy Memorial
  • Wall draws hero, US Champ, in simul by LM Brian Wall
  • USCF Rules Corner by Paul Grimm
  • Readers games – Mikhail Ponomarev vs Jim Hamblin
  • Chess Detective – Perceptive Private Eyes Ponder Pawn Possibilites by NM Todd Bardwick
  • DCC Halloween Charity Tournament
  • A Grimm New Year’s Resolution for 2004 by Paul Grimm
  • The Computer Geek
  • The Kosher Patzer does Dallas by Shannon Fox
  • An Informal Survey of CO Chess Attendance
Posted in Colorado Chess Informant | Leave a comment

Colorado Chess Master Robert Synder on America’s Most Wanted

 

There are several videos on the America’s Most Wanted website about Robert Synder, including the interview below, plus an interview with one of his victims, and the victim’s mom.

The police officer in the video below really rips in Synder calling him a loser and a “typical chess nerd”.

http://www.amw.com/fugitives/case.cfm?id=68580

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Red hot pawn Colorado Chess group

RHP logo

There is a new group for Colorado Chess players on the online correspondence chess site Red Hot Pawn.

http://www.redhotpawn.com/club/home.php?clubid=221

I personally know some of the players, including Klaus Johnson, Jerry Maier, Dean Brown, and Pete Short.

Posted in Correspondance | Leave a comment

George Kostanza on Chess

Paul Anderson and Anthea Carson both posted this video on their facebook page, which is pretty funny. The title is a little misleading, because Jerry Seinfeld isn’t in it, but it is from the tv show Seinfeld.

Posted in Fun | Leave a comment

Sudoku Tournament

This is an interesting video that I found linked from digg.com. It is interesting to see how a sudoku tournament kind of resembles a chess tournament.

The most interesting part is a guy in a hood that in the end is accused of cheating. At the end they briefly mention that this same guy was also accused of cheating at the World Open Chess tournament in Philadelphia, which I have played in.

Posted in Tournaments | 2 Comments

April 2005 Colorado Chess Informant

April 2005 Colorado Chess Informant

Here is another past issue in my quest to upload as many past issues as I can.  Most of the other issues that I uploaded came directly from the soft copy in Microsoft Publisher, and just had to be converted to PDF.  For this issue, I had to scan it in.  This was my last issue as editor during my run in 2004 and 2005.

This issue features:

  • Artwork by Anthea Carson of Life Master Brian Wall
  • Nobody Makes me Bleed my own Blood by LM Brian Wall
  • Interview with Tyler Hughes by his original teacher
  • DCC game of the year by Andy Rea
  • Review of Kasparov and the Machine
  • Mystery of the Wayward Queen by NM Todd Bardwick
  • Recent advances in the Electronic Storage of Chess Positions by Colin James III
  • Readers Games – Andrew Ritchie
  • Speaker of 2 International Languages/ Chess and Music – An Interview with Richard Buchanan by Zisa Mogilefsky
  • Mackenzie Mical – Durango youth chess queen heads to Florida
  • Winter Springs open 2004 games
  • USCF Rules Corner
  • Mike Valvo remembered
Posted in Colorado Chess Informant | Leave a comment

The Mitch and Gordon October Show

 

East Coast Deli October Tournament Results Issue by Fred Spell.

Correction on Nov 19.  I originally thought that Jerry Maier made the newsletter, but it is actually Fred Spell.  Fred is going to send me some of his other back issues as well.  Fred did a great job with this newsletter!  Very colorful, and nicely designed.

Posted in Games, Tournaments | Leave a comment

January 2005 Colorado Chess Informant

The July 2005 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • Chess tourney brings Masters, youngsters to Durango
  • Larimer County Report by Randy Reynolds
  • DCC 24 Hours of Chess Heaven
  • Teaching Chess in the 21st Century by NM Todd Bardwick
  • 2004 DCC King Hunt
  • Kosher Patzer vs Spooky Hughes by Shannon Fox
  • 2004 Western States Open
  • Amos Burn A Chess Biography Review by Terry Powell
  • CO Chess Survey Scholastic – Curtis Crockett
  • Tyler Hughes vs Pete Karagianis by J.C. MacNeil
  • Colorado Springs Chess Club by Zisa Mogilefsky
  • How the Southern Colorado Open was won by Andy Rea
  • Readers games: Marc Jimenez vs Jeffrey Baffo
  • Halloween pictures
  • CO Chess Survey by Paul Anderson
  • DCC Report by Paul Grimm
  • Postcard from Kuwait by Andy Rea
  • You can’t do this to me by LM Brian Wall
  • Styles of Blitz by LM Brian Wall
  • Tactics Books reviewed
Posted in Colorado Chess Informant | Leave a comment

July 2009 Colorado Chess Informant

July 2009 Colorado Chess Informant

Features

  • Tyler Hughes Interview
  • Randy Reynolds farewell
  • President’s Report by Klaus Johnson
  • GM Gulko vs Hughes from the US Championship
  • Colorado Closed report
  • Colorado Class Games
  • Knights don’t like the Rim by NM Todd Bardwick
  • Colorado Coorespondance Update
  • Ward vs Lundstrom 1983
  • Trust your Instincts by Jeff Baffo
  • Trojan Horse Game by Randy Reynolds
  • Make Haste Slowly by Paul Anderson
Posted in Colorado Chess Informant | Leave a comment

Response from USCF regards my sandbagging claims from the National Open

Tim,

Thanks for taking the time to write about this. 

If we have evidence that a player is sandbagging, then we take the appropriate action.  As you know, we use the CCA Minimum Rating List – this year we raised the rating (and section) on five players who are on that list.

I notice that less than two years ago your rating was 1837 but you’ve dropped into Class B and you have been there since then.  (Tim’s note: Actually it was 3 years ago – June 2006 http://www.uschess.org/msa/MbrDtlRtgSupp.php?12718954)  If someone reported to me that you are doing that intentionally, what should I tell them?  Well, of course I would tell them that ratings fluctuate up and down, and that all players experience such fluctuations.  I’m confident that you are not a sandbagger.  But, your rating has dropped 175 points.  Your own results at this year’s National Open were very good.  There is a 212:1 chance that a player rated 1662 would score 4.5 out of 5 against a 1775 average, but you did it.  If you had won your last-round game then the odds of a player rated 1662 scoring 5.5 out of 6 against those players would be 621:1.  In that case, how would I defend an accusation that you had been sandbagging?  I would tell them the same thing, show me the proof.  Likewise, if you have proof of any player intentionally lowering their rating below a section limit, we want to know about that.  But if someone says “I’ll bet he did” or “this looks suspicious”, that is not proof.

We did a little research about ratings as a result of your comments.  There are about 20,000 players whose established ratings can be compared between the June ‘08 and June ‘09 supplements.  Forty-one lost over 200 points; 750 lost over 150 points.  It’s unlikely that very many of them are sandbaggers.  Players move up and down all the time.  A one hundred point swing is actually predicted in the math (see “Rating of Chess Players” by Arpad Elo).  There are many reasons why ratings go down or players experience losses when playing “way” down.

In the first round of the National Open many years ago I lost to Alina Markowski – the rating difference was about 550 points.  I blundered a knight away in the opening and then for the rest of the game she played like Bobby Fischer.  :-)  It happens.

The odds of a player scoring 1/3 against players 500 points lower is about 350:1, but actually the players in question were more like 400 points lower, so it’s about 135:1.  But looking at the whole tournament that you referred to, your opponent scored even against an average rating of 350+ points lower, which should happen much more often.  Maybe 1 in 20.  As soon as you mathematically quantify the definition of sandbagging rather than requiring proof, you will have done much more harm than good.

The time to publicly accuse a player of sandbagging is when you have proof.  If you have it you haven’t shared it with us, which tells me you don’t have any proof.

Even if we grant your accusation that your opponent is a sandbagger, the idea that he cost you a prize is a bit of an exaggeration.  At worst you went from unlikely to less likely – against a “legitimate” 1776 you are a 3:1 underdog.

Your suggestion of 100 point floors would be highly inflationary to the rating system – and was, when it was tried.  Any ideas you have you are welcome to share with the Rules Committee, of course.

In this specific instance, since your opponent is a regular at the Mechanics’ Chess club, you could check with John Donaldson for a character reference:  http://www.chessclub.org/news.php?n=444
We appreciate your comments.  I think that Al Losoff, the tournament organizer, may also respond to some of your observations.

Regards,

Bill Snead

Chief Tournament Director

Posted in Ratings, Tournaments | 1 Comment

Comments about the October 2009 Colorado Chess Informant

I was really excited when I learned that Fred Spell was going to be taking over the Colorado Chess Informant. I knew Randy was getting burned out, and that Fred would do a great job.

I was really impressed with the job that Fred did! As a former editor myself, I offered him some feedback. Here is a sampling of some of my thoughts.

  • Personally, I would vote for leaving the front cover the way that it was. Not because there is anything wrong with your cover, or the other cover was better. Simply because I like it when things like that stay the same in a “branding” sort of way. For example look at http://digg.com/d3ymnb. Coca-Cola has been the same since the 1800s, and Pepsi is changing all the time. I think it is cool when, for example, you look at a Rocky Mtn News from 1918, and the font at the top looks the same as it did in 1999. btw RIP Rocky Mtn News :-)

 

  • Re: Bucks comments that Julian Evans 503.97 tour points is possibly a record. Looking at an issue from 2003 Paul Grimm had 643.1 points, and Andy Rea had 741.4 (!) When I read that I was thinking – no way did he beat Grimm or Rea who were real nuts about getting tour points (playing two rated games at the same time just to get extra points, etc)

 

  • I really liked the little black king at the end of each article. I used to use a white rook, but I like yours MUCH more. Very nice.

 

  • Loved the clip art as well. Mine tended to be kind of cheesey, but yours was classy and nice.

 

  • Re: The photographs: I would rather see one close up picture of player X, than a group shot of whoever. One group shot is ok, but not all group shots. It is kind of like the ads for starving kids in Africa. They don’t say – donate to these millions of kids who are hungry. They say “This is Bobby. He is starving. You could feed him for the price of a cup of coffee.” It is better imo to show a picture of one person, than the group shot that could be any chess club in America. The book “Made to Stick” talks about this idea a lot. I realize you might not have been the one to take the pics, and that might have been all u had to work with.

 

  • Love the CSCA Seal. Very cool.

 

  • I probably would throw in at least one or two cross tables, esp if it was a major event like the Colorado Open. Of course this is available online, but I think that people like to see their name in print, and again kind of breaks things up. There is no way I will play over a 60 move Jerry Maier vs Dean Brown draw, but I probably would peruse the CO Open cross table – lol :-)

 

  • Love the consistent use of fonts and diagrams. Very nice. I was guilty of it lookings like a church bullentin with every article in different fonts, sizes, spacing, etc.

 

  • Some more diagrams for the chess games might be nice. Even if you have to cut out a few games. It can help break up the page as well.

 

  • Some of the tournaments that are basically the same over and over (like the quads) could probably be combined some way in the TLAs. They are all the same location, all have the same directions, all start at the same times, etc. If you need to fill the space, that is ok. Just some food for thought.

Overall great job, and I think it is super that you took over!!! Randy and I know it is not an easy job!! Congrats on the well deserved volunteer award as well. Keep up the great work!!!

Posted in Colorado Chess Informant | Leave a comment

World Open 2009 Review

After years of wanting to do it, I finally made my first pilgrimage to the World Open in Philadelphia, PA over 4th of July weekend. Here are some of my thoughts

Things I liked:

  • The location is awesome. Everything that I did not like about the location of the National Open, I loved about the location of the World Open.  The tournament was held at the Sheraton City Center in Downtown Philadelphia.  No boring Airport Hotel, no boring suburb hotel, no boring middle of nowhere hotel.  This was right in the heart of the action.  Very nice.  There was so much to see and do around the hotel it was amazing.

 
View Larger Map

Some of the things to do and see nearby (all within walking distance)

Art Museum

Science Museum

Rocky Statue

Comcast Building (which is very cool)

Independence Hall

Liberty Bell

JFK Park (Love Park)

and much more.

I had a blast walking around, looking at the fountains, and the old buildings and statues.  It is a really amazing city.  This part alone makes it worth it to go to this tournament, especially if you have never been to Philadelphia, or have not been there in a while.

  • It is a lot of fun to see all of the assorted characters at these things.  I get to see and interact with lots of people that I don’t get to on a regular basis.  There was a huge diversity of people running around – Black guys playing blitz, transvestites, little asian kids, hot eastern European Women, white bearded old men, dirty bums, obese guys, hardcore Jews, nerds with corny t-shirts, cute chess moms, etc.  It is really hard to say what a “typical” chess player looks like.  It truly is a World event as well.  I played a guy that flew in from Columbia.  My friend Pete played a kid that flew in from Taiwain.

Things I didn’t like:

  • My biggest problem was with the fact that the tournament was basically split onto two floors.  This basically took away a lot of the presitage (at least in my mind) of playing in such a large event.  I remember playing at the HB Global in Minnesota, and there was a very special feeling when you walked into a huge tournament hall with hundreds of boards set up, and everyone in the same room.  At the World Open, I never really felt this at all.  Looking at some of the pictures, you might think it was a good turnout for the Colorado Open, because all of the sections were playing in different rooms and floors.

Many other big tournaments that I have played in have everyone in the same room like the Western States Open in Reno, National Open in Vegas, etc.  I realize with 1000 players, this is not as easy to do, but I know it can be done.

  • No Monroi support for the class players.  This was a pet peeve of mine at the National Open, and was much worse at the World Open, because it was like they didn’t even try.  At least at the National open, you felt they were trying, just constantly having problems.  At the World Open it was like the Have’s and the Have nots.  If you were on the top floor then your games mattered.  If you were 1800 or below, they don’t.

I am not sure what can be done about this.  I think that maybe the SwissSys software and the Monroi software need to be able to play together.  There were quite a few players using Monrois at the World Open.  I actually had one player, who was ironically a chess coach, ask me about it, and tell me that I was supposed to have a note from the Tournament Director in order to use it.  This was the first time anyone challenged me on it.  I told him that he was welcome to get the tournament director before the game if he wanted to, and that I had used it dozens of times before.  Afterwards I did ask the TDs, and they had never heard of such an absurd thing.

  • Friday (might have been Saturday) morning there seemed to be a lot of forfeit wins going on.  I asked one of the TDs and he said that there were some people that reentered that did not get deleted from the previous sections they were in.  This is a real shame.  It is a waste of time for the people who want to play, it is also somewhat of an advantage to them, since they get a point for free.  If people just don’t show up there is nothing that the TDs or anyone can do about this, but if it was caused by computer problems, that is not good.

 

  • Compared to the National Open, and other big tournaments, where they provide the board and sets, it is kind of a pain to have to bring your own.  I realize that for them to have hundreds of boards isn’t easy, but it is nice when the boards are already provided and set up.  It was funny to see one player show up at the board being paired as black, and asking his opponent to put away the board she already had set up.  I have kind of been taking that for granted.
  • The elevators in the hotel were the worst of any hotel I have ever stayed at.  They were totally unreliable.  I was staying on the 21st floor.  The first time I went up, the elevator totally skipped 21, went to 22 (which wasn’t selected), then started going back to the lobby.  You never knew what it was going to do.  And they would get quite crowded because everyone would be going at the same time for the start of the rounds (not much you can do about that). 
  • The bathrooms needed a lot more attention – with 1000 chess players, mostly all guys, hoped up on coffee, and all the free water you can drink, the bathroom was normally a mess.  No paper towels, no soap, etc.
  • There were a ton of people coughing.  Not much you can do about this, but seemed like a couple had swine flu, and were not afraid to share.  My opponent in the first round, kept a hankerchief over his mouth the whole time, to avoid getting sick.

Overall though, was a great tournament, and I am glad that I finally got a chance to do it.

Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

Bobby Fischer Auction

Pretty cool video showing the actual auction of all of Bobby Fischer’s chess library. Might have been cool if the guy doing it was talking really really ridiculously fast but is still neat to watch!  Also would have been neat to see it sell on eBay – probably could have gotten a higher bid.

Posted in Fun | Leave a comment

Great Fishing Pole Youtube video

This video does a great job showing and breaking down the fundamentals of the Fishing Pole.  This is required viewing for anyone playing chess in Colorado!  He mentions my good buddy Francisco at the end of the video, and his win over GM Walter Browne, which I was a witness of, and captured on video myself.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnN9mqed3l0

Posted in Openings, Tactics | Leave a comment

Hey Mon, it’s a Monroi!

After rereading some of the old issues of the Colorado Chess Informant that I just uploaded to the blog here, I was amused when rereading some of the articles about the Monroi.  Randy Reynolds wrote an article called “Monroi: The Segway of Chess”.  This was a very humorous article, comparing the Monroi to a Segway.  Which in a lot of ways is a very valid comparison.

In the next issue Todd Bardwick and I both wrote articles.  My article was called “Monroi: The iPod of chess” and Todd’s article was basically pointing out how unnecessary the monroi is.  Randy later wrote another article about someone who actually purchased a monroi called “Monroi Man”. 

After all these articles, and the cognitive dissonance I felt after writing my own article about it, I decided to buy a Monroi myself.  This was a graduation present to myself for completing my Masters Degree in Computer Science after taking one class at a time in the evenings for years and years.

Now, I have always been a technology gadget guy.  I owned the second generation palm pilot back in 1997 when most people didn’t even have email addresses, or know what a “PDA” was.  I loved the palm, and used various generations over the years.  I loved the Palm V.  That was a great design.  I love my blackberry.  I love my iPod.  I wore a BodyBugg for months to count my calories.  My mom used to call me “Inspector Gadget” because I loved stuff like this.  So the Monroi fit right in.

The first question people would always ask me when they saw it was “How much did that cost”.  I never really wanted to answer this question, and I am still not sure if it is rude or not to ask.  I usually would say “A lot”, or “A couple hundred bucks”.  I would have to go back and look, but I probably paid about 350 dollars for it.  So certainly not cheap.  It is a good example of “Conspicuous consumption”, which basically means buying something that isn’t all that useful, just to say in a subtle way ”I have so much money, that I can waste it on this monroi” – lol :-)

But like I said – it was a gift to me, from me for a special occasion.

So – now that I have had it for a while, what do I think of it?

Well – I like it, but I am ready for Monroi 2.0.

Let’s start with the things I don’t like about it.

  • At this point, it seems large.  If you compare it to all the other modern technologies, iPod, Palm, Blackberry, or just about anything, the Monroi seems large, and heavy.  I realize that a company like Apple can spend millions and millions on design and technology that such a specialized product like a Monroi cannot.  But it would be nice if it could fit in a shirt pocket.
  • It would be nice if there were upgrades available to the interface.  Just like you can download new versions of iTunes, it would be nice if there were software upgrades to the monroi.
  • I would love to see more short cuts available.  For example, I have played a ton of rated games against Anthea Carson.  It would be nice if the monroi knew when I started to type Anthea, that I probably was referring to her, and offered an auto complete suggestion, just like when you start typing a query into google.  If they are using standard gui widgets, this should not be that hard to do.  We added this feature to a software program at work in about an hour.
  • I do not like the way the games are stored on the device.  It would be nice if you could create a “tournament”, then add new games to the tournament.  So instead of always adding new games, I would first create a tournament – like “Pikes Peak Open”.  Then just click Round 1, and all the information would be added.  Instead each time you have to type something like “Pikes Peak Open” in the tournament name, not to mention the date, etc. 
  • I am not sure I am using the device correctly when it comes to getting my games off of it.  I normally just take the memory card out, and put it into my computer, and read it, just like an external drive.  This was fine when I only had a few games, but now it is getting harder and harder to find games on the card.  The monroi names each PGN file with an old school 8.3 DOS filename format.  I am not sure why they do this.  So if you name the file Pikes Peak Open, the monroi will call it something like Pikes672.PGN.  Then the next game for this tournament will be Pikes673.PGN or something like that.  I would much rather have all this be hidden from me – and I can just sync it like an iPod or Palm, and never really worry how the device is storing it.  Again, I am not sure I am using the monroi correctly here.  But iPod and Palm are certainly more intuitive.
  • Save button – when you end a game you really have to click and hold down the save button until the game is written on the card.  This is very odd.
  • The case is not connected, and is very easy to lose (which I did).

Things I like

  • I think the board the monroi uses is great.  The pieces, the colors, the clarity – perfect.  Not one complaint
  • Making the moves is VERY fast.  I get almost 100% of my games now in notation, and use much less time on my clock.  You just click the piece, and click the square you want it to go to.  Very simple. 
  • Much less distracting than using notation.  The shift your mind has to make is very little.  When you have to write down the moves, it takes more time, your pencil breaks, your pen runs out of ink, you need a second scoresheet, you missed a move, etc. 
  • Very error proof.  Todd Bardwick says that doing notation is as simple as counting from 1-8 and from a-h.  At the most basic level this is true.  This is also coming from someone that doesn’t play over the board tournament chess anymore where you have to keep score (no offense).  I have seen a lot of score sheets, and they ALL contain errors.  As a former editor of the Colorado Chess Informant, almost every submission, if the person was not using chessbase to input the game, contained errors.  Experience has nothing to do with it.  Anthea Carson, who is one of the most active players in Colorado can barely read her own score sheets, even immediately after the game is over.  Even strong players, experts and masters often have mistakes.  Brian Wall is the only person I have ever seen that doesn’t make mistakes on his score sheets.  The monroi solves this problem.
  • Immediate access to your game afterwards.  It is a pain in the butt to input your games into chessbase.  Especially if you wait a day or two.  Sometimes you find these errors, like mentioned above, and you cannot enter the game even if you want to.
  • Wireless capability.  This is a very cool feature.  Being able to broadcast the games live on the internet is really the best selling point for the monroi, and best use of modern technology.  However this also requires the tournament directors to have all of the equipment, know how to use it, and then actually use it.  At the National Open, even though I played 6 rounds, and the TDs had all the equipment, they didn’t take the time to enter any of my pairings into the computer, so none of my games were broadcast this year.  In 2008 5 of my 6 games were broadcast.  I am hoping some of them at the World Open will be. 
  • The battery life is good, and can be recharged just like a cell phone.  I did have my battery run out once during a game, but this was my fault for not charging it first.
  • There is a score sheet view, where you can see the game in Algebraic notation.  Several times my opponent asked me about a move that they had messed up on their score sheet, and you can show them this view.
  • Very little chance of not having the 40 move rule wrong.  I had one opponent in New Mexico “flag” me, even though I had made 40 moves, because his score sheet was wrong.  That was annoying, and embarrassing for him.
  • It is still possible to enter an illegal move.  The monroi does no move checking. 
  • You can actually leave the board, and still be looking at the position.
  • Compared to other common chess technology (Chronos Clock, Chessbase) it is relatively easy and straighforward to use.  Try handing someone a chronos who has never seen one, and asking them to set a time control.

Wish List

  • Make it faster to enter the data before the game.
  • Make it easier to sync the games
  • Make it easier to organize the games
  • Make it smaller, lighter
  • Lower the price
  • Give the TD software away for free, to get more people to use it, and buy more monrois in the process.  This is a common marketing strategy.
  • Have more distributors.  As far as I know the only place to buy a monroi is monroi.com
  • Have it connected to the USCF database.  If you could download the database, so it would automatically know all the players, their ratings, etc, that would be very cool.  The memory card has more than enough room for something like this.

Fun Facts

  • Even though everyone I know pronounces it Mon- Roy (rhymes with Boy), it is actually French, and pronounced like Patrick Roy the goal tender (mon Wah).  I never take the time to correct people, but if you are the type who likes to do stuff like that, here is a great chance :-)
  • I’ve convinced several other people to purchase one.  Tom Mullikin bought one, but has since gone back to Pen and paper – d’oh!!
  • Lots of people would say to me “I will wait for it to go down in price”.  My answer was always – I don’t think it is going to go down in price.  Why?  It is not like iPod where there is a ton of competition and millions of people buying it.  It is a very small market, and there is zero competition.  They have no reason to lower the price.  Which is part of the problem.  Competition would force monroi to make a better product.
  • My friend Pete had one person complain about using his.  I have never actually had this happen.

Bottom line – It is cool – it will make playing your games easier – it will be more accuratethan keeping score.  If you have a lot of disposable income, like gadgets, and play a fair number of rated games per year, get one.  If you don’t have a lot of disposable income, it is probably not worth it, unless you play in a lot of rated games (100+ a year) or really make a lot of errors, or waste a lot of time putting your games into Fritz/Chessbase, and can save up for one, and really want one.

Here is a cool video ad of MonRoi

Posted in Software, Technology | 6 Comments

More Colorado Chess Informant Past Issues!!

Super, Kick Ass thanks to Colorado Chess Informant editor Randy Reynolds of Ft. Collins who was kind enough to upload these to my FTP server. There are a ton of great chess related articles in here, and not just for people from Colorado!!

The April 2006 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • NM Todd Bardwick Interviews Houston Astro Brad Lidge
  • Paul Grimm interviews Allan Ufer
  • Curse of Kirsanbook review by Bruce Bain
  • The Chess Detective: Hazards of Grabbing Pawns
  • Christine Henderson games
  • Winter Springs open games

The July 2006 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • National Elementary K-6 Chess Championships
  • State Scholastic Report
  • Annotated game by Tyler Hughes
  • Thaoerick by LM Brian Wall
  • Knights of the South Bronxreview by Todd Bardwick
  • Susan Polgarvisits Denver
  • The day 1300s Ruled the Earth
  • 1300 Jokes
  • Colorado Closed report
  • Border war:  FT Collins vs Cheyenne
  • The Perfect Game
  • Which Way should the Knights Point
  • Mel Cahoon – Chess Jester

 

The October 2006 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • GM Dashzeveg Sharavdorj
  • Awaken the Giant Within by Timothy Brennan
  • A Moment of Clarity by Terry Powell
  • Sacrificing the Lady by NM Todd Bardwick
  • The Chess Mind by Anthea Carson
  • The Immortal Game: A History of Chessbook review by Bruce Bain
  • Regis Grand Prix
  • Jon and Barb Fortune
  • Wild Thing: Wallace vs Hamblin by LM Brian Wall
  • Pikes Peak Open games
  • CO State Checkers Champions
  • Monroi PCM: The Segway of Chess by Randy Reynolds

The January 2007 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • How are Paul Grimm and Kramnik alike?
  • Players speak their mind about the MonRoi
  • Western States Open
  • Larimer County Open games
  • Good Knights and Bad Bishops
  • Manny Presicci games
  • Ft. Collins Scholastic Chess
  • Chess Mazes: A New Kind of Chess Puzzle for EveryoneBook Review by Randy Reynolds
  • Chess Jokes by Paul Anderson
  • Denver Chess Club – the Sleeping giant
  • Ft. Collins Chess Championship

The April 2007 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • Kalia Smith and Tyler Hughes
  • Epic Struggles: A TD’s View
  • Scholastic Games
  • Loveland open
  • The Queen needs a Friend
  • Colorado Springs Club Championship Games
  • Lee’s Plea by Lee Lahti
  • The Worst Chess Game ever played by Paul Anderson
  • Shipp’s Log by Archie Shipp
  • I have to play Who??!!??

The July 2007 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • Brian Wall captures 3rd Colorado Closed Title
  • Colorado Closed Report and games
  • Scholastic Closed games
  • Pawn Princesses: Exploring the Female Side of Chess
  • Never Resign
  • Monroi Man
  • Anthea’s Secret Weapon
  • Colorado Springs vs Fort Collins
  • Brian’s 15 minute challenge

The October 2007 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • How to Play Chess like an Animal
  • Colorado Open and Membership Meeting
  • The King and I by LM Brian Wall
  • Cutting off the King by NM Todd Bardwick
  • How to beat your Granddad at Checkers
  • Jackson’s Trip to Nationals
  • Pikes Peak Open games
  • The $116.76 endgame
  • Colorado Tour Winners
  • Snow White retold

The January 2008 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • Chess nuts roasting (probably best cover ever!)
  • Perfection by Dwayne Langseth
  • Klaus Johnson at the Oklahoma Marathon
  • Sacrificing to Force Mate by NM Todd Bardwick
  • The Lion Tamer by Paul and Matthew Anderson
  • Larimer County Open games
  • Tactics Time
  • Introducing the G29 Grand PrixLife in the Lower Sections by Lee Lahti
  • Dre Bly Rules the Chessboard at Dove Valley
  • In-N-Out Chess by Randy Reynolds
  • Pete Short exercising First Amendment rights (humor)

The April 2008 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • Scholastic Championships
  • Annotated games by Cory Foster, Matt Lasley and Paul Anderson
  • Bobby Fischer Tribute
  • Tyler Hughes games
  • Be careful grabbing pawns
  • Loveland Open games
  • Tactics Time
  • G29 Grand Prix update
  • Kendel Boyd Crose 1944-2008
  • Life in the Lower Sections by Lee Lahti
  • The return of Tom Bourie

The July 2008 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • The Usual Suspects – Colorado Closed
  • Colorado Closed games
  • Spring is Spring report and games
  • Bobby Fischer Memorial report and games
  • Parting with the Lady by Todd Bardwick
  • Scholastics under the Microscope by Bob Rasmussen
  • Colorado Springs Open games
  • Poems ’bout chess
  • A tale of two grandmasters by Paul Anderson

The October 2008 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • Great turnout at 2008 Colorado Open
  • USCF Delegates Meeting
  • Victory in Kansas by Tyler Hughes
  • Shipp’s Log by Archie Shipp
  • Studies!?  What are they?  by Bob Rasmussen
  • Capturing in the Right Order Makes a Big Difference by NM Todd Bardwick
  • Political Cartoon by Randy Reynolds
  • Full Strength by LM Brian Wall
  • Pikes Peak Open games by Richard Buchanan

The April 2009 Colorado Chess Informant features

  • Tyler Hughes not on Board 1 at Scholastics Championship??
  • Economical Paul Anderson technique for giving gifts
  • Dean Brown: Chess Volunteer award
  • Alexa Lasley: Warranted Veneration from a Father
  • The Future of Colorado Chess Begins in China
  • The $6000 game
  • Valentine Tournament games
  • Underdog Chess
  • Forcing a stalemate by NM Todd Bardwick
  • Colorado Correspondance Update
  • Fort Collins Club Championship
  • Winter Springs Open games
  • Family Chess Knights
  • Random game from Boulder Winter Grand Prix

Books and DVDs mentioned above:

Posted in Colorado Chess Informant | Leave a comment

USCF President agrees with Timmy on Sandbagging

 

After my sandbagging incident at the National Open in Vegas I wrote a letter to Bill Goichberg, who is running for the USCF Board, has served as President of the USCF, and is the leading organizer of large chess tournaments in the US, such as the World Open on http://www.chesstour.com.
Bill had sent me a letter in the mail asking for his vote (which he got).  In exchange, I asked him to look into the sandbagging issue in general.  I don’t expect any action to really take place for my specific game, but would like to see things like that prevented from happening in the future. 
Unlike the organizers of the Vegas tournament, who I never heard back from, Bill actually looked into the matter, and gave me his feedback. His letter (and my original) is below.
 
In a message dated 6/8/2009 7:16:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, TimmyBx writes:
Dear Bill,
Just wanted you to know I plan to vote for you. 
Thank you!  Sorry for slow reply.
  
I am hoping that you can do something about the problem of sandbagging.  I played in the National Open this weekend.  I lost in the last round to a player named Afkham-Ebrahimi,Payam rated 1776. 
But when I looked at his rating history

It seems pretty clear that he was purposely losing games in order to keep his rating low.  For example losing to both a 1200 and a 1300 in the same tournament.  For a former 1950+ rated player, this seems hard to believe that there would be such HUGE upsets in one tournament. 
 

I agree, this doesn’t look right. I have now assigned him 1800 minimum for CCA tournaments. 

 One idea would be to change it so that the floor is 100 points lower than your highest rating.  So if your highest rating is 1950, then your rating floor is 1800 (not 1700).  The way it is now a person could go all the way to 1999 then all the way back to 1700.  That seems like a huge margin (299 points).

USCF had this rule, a 100 point floor, in the 1990s but after awhile, about 10% of all players were on their floors, there was much opposition to this, and the 200 point floors were restored.
 
I know you have taken steps to employ measures in your events, and would like to see the USCF do something in general to prevent this.
USCF issues floors to players who win $2000 or over in U2000 or lower, so Afkham-Ebrahimi will get a USCF floor as well, in August.
I would have won 3000 dollars had I won this last round game.  I just don’t think it seems right, when I look at the rating history and see that the guy was one game away from being an expert at one point, and is going undefeated in the B section.
If the National Open used the rules that CCA does for our largest prize events, his prize would have been limited to $1500 as his rating was over 1830 during the past year.
 
Bill Goichberg
 
Good luck!
Tim Brennan
Colorado Springs
 
I think it is really great how at the Continential Chess tournaments my opponents prize money would have been restricted.  The CCA is basically saying – we know we can’t stop you from losing rating points, and playing in a lower section, but we CAN prevent you from getting a huge payday.  They are also saying – the USCF might consider you a 1779 player, but in my tournament you are playing in the A section BIATCH!!
Thanks Bill!  You have my vote!
Posted in Tournaments | 2 Comments

Rating Tracker

I recently discovered a very cool new website for chess players – http://www.ratingtracker.com

 

This is what the USCF’s Member Service Area (MSA) http://msa.uschess.org – should have been.

 

In fact a few years ago I wrote the USCF an email which basically said – great job on the MSA (which was a huge leap forward for them), but that there is so much more stuff that they could be offering people, with that large amount of data.

 

A few years later Rating Tracker fills this void.  The amazing thing, is that it probably does not have direct access to the USCF database.  It has to derive all of this data by following the links from the website.  I am speculating here.  So it probably gathers all of the data, just like google does with a “spider” type program, puts it in its own database, and then allows the user to do different types of queries on the data.

 

There are a lot of cool things you can do including:

  • Display Rating history graph (similar to the only graph available from the USCF’s MSA page)  Figure 1.  You can also choose to only see regular rated games, quick rated games, and even performance ratings.  You can also show the ratings of two or more different people on the same graph. 
  • Ratings Tracker Graph 1

    Figure 1 Rating Supplement Data

  • Display Win/Loss/Draw graphs.  Figure 2 shows a really interesting chart that shows my wins losses, and draws by rating, and year.  There is a lot of great information just on this one chart. 
  • Ratings Tracker Win Loss Ratio

    Figure 2 Ratings Tracker Win Loss Ratio

  • Counts of the number of games played Figure 3 
  • Rating Tracker Counts of Games Played 

  • Records against specific opponents, Figure 4 
    Figure 4 Results for specific opponents

    Figure 4 Results for specific opponents

     

I know players that have kept their own meticulous records of these types of things in excel.  These were labors of love that took hours to create, and required constant care and feeding.  Now all of this data is available at the click of a button.

Downsides

  • Since the data is not being directly pulled from a USCF database it is slower, less likely to be up to date, and cannot be accessed right from the start.  It would be nice if the USCF offered a way for people to pull this data – like an LDAP connection.  This is not the fault of Rating Tracker, and it is amazing how they were able to pull the data they have.
  • Right now there is a limit to the trial free time, and number of people that you can follow (with a free account).  I don’t have a problem with this, as a software engineer myself, I think it is great if he makes money on this site.  As a user, I would love to see this as a free service the USCF offers.  I am probably not enough of a stat junkie to purchase an account myself at this time.  For 25$ a year I could follow 10 people, and for 40 dollars a year I can follow 30 people.  This seems fair to me.
  • A few things on the interface are a little clunky – like having to highlight a check box and clicking a “refresh” button.  It is kind of 1990s style, instead of being a more dynamic AJAX style.  But not a big deal, and more user friendly than a lot of websites.
  • The website seemed to freeze on me a couple of times.

Bottom line – if you are an USCF member and tournament player this site is a must see.  It probably won’t really tell you anything that will improve your play, but is very interesting.  You can see how you did against you top “rivals” and friends.   It will be a nice trip down memory lane as well.

There are a few more things that might be cool to add.  Here are some ideas

  • A map of the USA showing each of the states colored in where the player has played a rated game
  • A sandbagger alert – find all the players that have dropped 100+ rating points in the last 6 months, or the statistical outliers – the A players that have lost 10+ games in the last year to D players.
  • Stats comparing player X with everyone else.  For example, the average player draws 20% of the time, but John Doe draws 50% of the time. 

My wish would be for USCF to purchase this site, and the technology.   Or, at least start implementing some of the ideas themselves. Instead of spending thousands of dollars in lawsuits, give the members some real value, and purchase this website for $20,000, and integrate it into the MSA site.

http://www.ratingtracker.com

Posted in Ratings | 1 Comment

What makes a great playing site

Last night I played at the new location for the Wednesday night tournaments in Colorado Springs for the first time. I have to say, this is a great location to play at. It has just about all of the things that I really value.

  • Great Location – The East Coast Deli, downtown in Colorado Springs on Tejon
    View Larger Map

  • Great table sizes – the tables are spread out – one board per table, with plenty of room for standard size boards, clocks, drinks, score sheets, etc.  There is nothing worse than being cramped at a chess table.
  • Great lighting – I have played in a lot of church basements and places that are really dark and poorly lit.
  • Quiet – this is something that rarely bothers me, and I don’t mind playing in places like food courts, but I know some people are very sensitive to this.
  • Food/drinks available – the restaurant has a large selection.  I know many times I have rushed to grab a coffee or dinner before an evening game, but here it is not a problem, and all the refills that you can drink.
  • Friendly staff – this might be a given for most people, but I have played at places like the VFW Post 1 in Denver, where the staff was very rude.
  • Outlets – plenty of places for people to plug in their computers if they want to.
  • Visitor friendly – very easy for outsiders, parents or anyone to come in and watch if they want to, and good visability for the club.
  • Rent free (as far as I know) – can’t beat that!
  • Easily accessable – The tuesday Colorado Springs Club meets at a nursing home where the doors lock at 8.  So if you have to go outside for any reaason, it is very easy to get locked out.  This happened to me once, and it was about 10 minutes, before I was able to get back in.  What a pain in the butt!
  • Windows – I can’t stand playing in basements and places with no windows.  I feel like I am in a dungeon.

The only minor problem with the site are the bathrooms.  For example the men’s room doesn’t have a door on the stall, which was kind of surprising.  But I have seen much much worse bathrooms at playing sites, such as the Elk Lodge in Manitou Springs, which are vomit inducing, and can only hold one person at a time.  At the Denver Chess Club a few years ago there was someone who was always clogging the toilets, which we got yelled at several times.

If your club is looking for a place to play, these are all considerations to look for.  Great job by Fred Spell who found this site for the club.

Posted in Tournaments | Leave a comment

How to offer a draw

Last night at the Colorado Springs Wednesday night chess tournament I saw a humorous example of a player not offering a draw correctly. While relaying the story to my friend Francisco, who is also an avid tournament player, he said that he did not know this either. So I thought it might be helpful to go over the rules for offering a draw. Here is what happened in the words of my friend Pete, who was involved in the game.

What made it hilarious is with 0:14:00 on my clock and 0:13:00 on his clock he offers me a draw. The problem is, his clock was ticking and he had not made his move. So, I don’t answer and go into deep think. Meanwhile, he is becoming visibly frustrated because I have not answered him regarding his draw request and his clock is ticking. Eventually he asks me, “Are you going to accept the draw or not?”. So I politely respond, “Hang on a second” (meanwhile, his clock is burning down). I’m going to let this dude hang as long as he is feeding rope. So at about 0:07:00 on his clock, he grabs his King and moves it over and is sure that the draw offer is now officially nullified thru that action. I sat and thought and thought and thought and thought about the position hoping to see a win. Fritz agreed later with my analysis – any good move answered by a good move was a draw – any stupid move followed by a good move was a loss. So at about 0:05:00 on my clock, I announce, “I accept your draw offer”. As predicted, Powers who is standing by the way, says “No!! I want to play on”. And I say, You made a draw offer and I accept. So his head is about to explode! I mean right off the neck. He says, “You did not accept my draw offer so I made my move, keep playing”. I was about to explain the USCF rules to him … when good ole Jerry the TD intervened and restored harmony by explaining to Powers that “Make your move, Make your draw request, then hit your clock” and that the draw counted and the situation was resolved without bloodshed.

So the moral of the story is that once you offer a draw, the draw offer is valid until your opponent makes HIS move. Your opponent has the right to make you move before accepting the draw. This is generally a good idea on the off chance that the opponent might blunder.

So in review: Make a move, offer a draw, hit your clock.

It is also considered good etiquette to not offer a draw continuously. I have had little kids sit there with their hand extended literally for 10 minutes indicating that a draw offer is available – they love to do this especially when losing badly!

One other warning – if your opponent sticks his hand out in a losing position, do not assume they are resigning. They might be offering a draw!! Ask them specifically “Are you resigning?”

This happened to my friend Francisco. He was playing a guy, was beating him, and they guy sticks out his hand. Francisco shakes it, assuming that meant “I resign”. They go to the cross table to mark it off. Francisco starts to mark it off as a win for him, when the guy says “I thought that was a draw”.

So always make sure! Have the guy sign your score sheet, and ASK before shaking a hand. I think that the movie “Searching for Bobby Fischer” taught people that you can offer a draw just by putting your hand out, because this is what Josh does when trying to be nice to his opponent.

Posted in Rules | 1 Comment

Canard Opening, How to Play Chess like an Animal

Here is a lost chapter from How to Play Chess Like an Animal by Life Master Brian Wall and Anthea Carson!

The Canard Lesson

Posted in Books | Leave a comment

Last round sandbagger costs Timmy 2901 dollars

This is a letter that I wrote to the USCF organizers of the National Open.

 

It looks to me like my opponent in the last round of the U1800 is a “sandbagger”.  http://www.uschess.org/msa/MbrDtlMain.php?12475870

 

If you look at his rating history, in particular this tournament:
http://www.uschess.org/msa/XtblMain.php?200903155281-12475870

 

You can see that he lost to a 1286 JEFFREY TAO (13731854) and a 1374 rated player STEVEN JAMES CLARKE  (12507891).

 

As a result of these huge upsets he lost 50 rating points, which easily put him back into the B section.

 

This time a year ago he was rated 1984.  Going into the tournament he was rated 1776,  So he lost 200 rating points in 1 year.  This is quite a lot.  Especially for a young man in his prime with nothing wrong with him, and a proven history of success.

 

I would be curious statistically what are the odds of a 1984 rated player losing to 2 D players in the same tournament.  I would think that they are about the same as getting struck by lightning.

 

I also would wonder how many players, out of the 100,000 members lost more than 200 points in one year.  I would guess very few. 

 

Then he has the tournament of his life when 3000 dollars is on the line.  Hmmmm

 

I am not sure that there is anything that you can do about this, but I think the rules committee needs to look at this.  Possibly even award me a win, if this is against the rules.

 

It seems to me like more strict measures need to be put in place to prevent things like this in the future.  For example the HB global tournament in Minnesota used your highest rating of the last year, so you can’t tank a month before the tournament like this guy did. 

 

Why not have 100 point floors instead of 200.  So if you get to 1984, one victory away from expert, your new floor is at least 1800.  Being able to go from 1999 to 1700 seems absurd.

 

I had a great time at the tournament.  You can read my comments about it at http://www.timmybx.com

 

Cheers,
Tim Brennan
12718954
Life Member

Posted in Rules | 2 Comments